Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windows 11 - WSL2 takes 10+ minutes to launch #11692

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
plasma-vision opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Windows 11 - WSL2 takes 10+ minutes to launch #11692

plasma-vision opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@plasma-vision
Copy link

Windows Version

Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.22631.3737]

WSL Version

2.1.5.0

Are you using WSL 1 or WSL 2?

  • WSL 2
  • WSL 1

Kernel Version

5.15.146.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2

Distro Version

Ubuntu 24.04, Ubuntu 22.04, Kali Linux

Other Software

Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 4.10.08029 (this has known issues with WSL2, but I don't seem to be having problems with the networking)

Repro Steps

Start from a freshly booted computer.
Launch a WSL Linux distro, or run a WSL.EXE command.
Wait....................
.............................
.............................

Expected Behavior

I expect it to launch in less than a minute (previously it would launch in under 10 seconds).

Actual Behavior

I've tried 3 distros (Ubuntu 22.04, Ubuntu 24.04 and Kali Linux) and they all have the same problem.
Even trying to run wsl.exe commands takes 10+ minutes.

dmesg shows long gaps in time between hv_balloon and /sbin/ldconfig, then another gap between some Ioctl failed messages for dxgk and /sbin/ldconfig.real

See attached snippit from dmesg output.

I've fully uninstalled WSL and reinstalled, but the issue persists.

I've tried re-installing the NVIDIA drivers for Windows because the dxgk errors appear to be related to DirectX.
I tried disabling the GPU (gpuSupport=false) in .wslconfig, and that got rid of the Ioctl failures, but the loading of WSL took even longer.

Is anyone else experiencing this?

[    1.731326] EXT4-fs (sdc): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: discard,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered. Quota mode: none.
[   49.650182] hv_balloon: Max. dynamic memory size: 16234 MB
[  375.557342] /sbin/ldconfig:
[  375.557345] /usr/lib/wsl/lib/libcuda.so.1 is not a symbolic link

[  375.701335] FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected
[  375.701705] FS-Cache: O-cookie c=00000008 [p=00000002 fl=222 nc=0 na=1]
[  375.701948] FS-Cache: O-cookie d=0000000085840207{9P.session} n=0000000035e3d955
[  375.702193] FS-Cache: O-key=[10] '34323934393734383430'
[  375.702372] FS-Cache: N-cookie c=00000009 [p=00000002 fl=2 nc=0 na=1]
[  375.702608] FS-Cache: N-cookie d=0000000085840207{9P.session} n=00000000c5a37aa8
[  375.702859] FS-Cache: N-key=[10] '34323934393734383430'
[  375.875271] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -22
[  375.875671] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -22
[  375.876001] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -22
[  375.876328] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -2
[  375.877581] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -22
[  375.877915] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -22
[  375.878203] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -22
[  375.878553] misc dxg: dxgk: dxgkio_query_adapter_info: Ioctl failed: -2
[  739.908389] /sbin/ldconfig.real:
[  739.908392] /usr/lib/wsl/lib/libcuda.so.1 is not a symbolic link

Diagnostic Logs

No response

Copy link

Logs are required for review from WSL team

If this a feature request, please reply with '/feature'. If this is a question, reply with '/question'.
Otherwise please attach logs by following the instructions below, your issue will not be reviewed unless they are added. These logs will help us understand what is going on in your machine.

How to collect WSL logs

Download and execute collect-wsl-logs.ps1 in an administrative powershell prompt:

Invoke-WebRequest -UseBasicParsing "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/WSL/master/diagnostics/collect-wsl-logs.ps1" -OutFile collect-wsl-logs.ps1
Set-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope Process -Force
.\collect-wsl-logs.ps1

The scipt will output the path of the log file once done.

Once completed please upload the output files to this Github issue.

Click here for more info on logging
If you choose to email these logs instead of attaching to the bug, please send them to wsl-gh-logs@microsoft.com with the number of the github issue in the subject, and in the message a link to your comment in the github issue and reply with '/emailed-logs'.

View similar issues

Please view the issues below to see if they solve your problem, and if the issue describes your problem please consider closing this one and thumbs upping the other issue to help us prioritize it!

Closed similar issues:

Note: You can give me feedback by thumbs upping or thumbs downing this comment.

@plasma-vision
Copy link
Author

Well, moments after posting this, I managed to fix it.
I tried running wsl.exe --status, which timed out with a memory error, so I thought to try looking at Windows virtual memory settings (something I haven't thought of for years).
It was set to "Automatically manage paging file size for all drives". I unchecked that. Chose "no paging file" and clicked set. Then I changed my mind and switched back to "System managed size", and re-enabled "Automatically manage paging file size for all drives" and clicked OK. It asked me to reboot, and now WSL launches quickly every time.
This seems like a totally random fix, if in fact that is what fixed the issue, but if you are having the same problem, give it a try.
I had been trying to fix this for weeks.

@plasma-vision
Copy link
Author

I guess we can close this, since I was able to fix it. I'm still puzzled about why this was an issue, but I've wasted enough time on it already. I hope it helps someone else facing the same issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant