You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should the split story that results have a relation back to the original story? i.e. a "Related To" or "Successor of" relation back to the original story. The comment that is posted is helpful to manually add this in, but would be preferable if this was handled by the feature.
Could this be a feature built into the tool? perhaps with the option to choose which relation in the dialog
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@BillWoodNHS Thank you for your suggested feature, I will put this issue on our internal tracking board so the product owner can prioritize it.
Secondly, which comment are you referring to?
@BillWoodNHS Thank you for your suggested feature, I will put this issue on our internal tracking board so the product owner can prioritize it. Secondly, which comment are you referring to?
Apologies for not being clear, by "the comment" I am referring to the existing feature of the tool that adds a discussion post into the new work items and old work items when using Split.
i.e. "This work item was split from work item [6390]..."
This does point the new work item back to the first work item as a related item, but it would be helpful to be able to customise this relationship, as part of the generation of the new item, and make it a successor (in my use case, but others may want different relationships)
Should the split story that results have a relation back to the original story? i.e. a "Related To" or "Successor of" relation back to the original story. The comment that is posted is helpful to manually add this in, but would be preferable if this was handled by the feature.
Could this be a feature built into the tool? perhaps with the option to choose which relation in the dialog
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: