Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Session Affinity to Traffic splitting #47

Closed
shibayan opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Support for Session Affinity to Traffic splitting #47

shibayan opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Networking Related to ACA networking roadmap This feature is on the roadmap

Comments

@shibayan
Copy link

As far as I have tested, with traffic splitting, reloading randomly accesses a different revision. To achieve A/B testing, the same user is required to access the same revision, thus session affinity is necessary.

Do you have any plans to support it?

@thara0402
Copy link

+1

@TonyHenrique
Copy link

TonyHenrique commented May 30, 2022

Does Blazor Server App works on Container Apps? How would the Web Browser client <-> ContainerApp Environment know how to route to the appropriate instance when the container has more than 1 instance?

Perhaps a solution would be to have an Http Header set that would indicate the affinity to the original Container App Instance Id where this client loaded that blazor session.

Link to a discussion on Twitter thread

@quality-leftovers
Copy link

quality-leftovers commented Jul 14, 2022

I searched for azure container apps traffic routing / splitting / sharding behavior and found nothing in the docs, but stumbled on this issue,

Would be nice, if documentation had some info on ingress traffic splitting / routing / sharding / affinity ...

@thohan88
Copy link

Based on this issue, there appears to be wide support for enabling sticky sessions in Azure Container Apps. Is this a feature on the roadmap?

@kendallroden
Copy link
Contributor

kendallroden commented Sep 14, 2022

Yes it is on the roadmap. we are still in the investigation phase

@kendallroden kendallroden added Networking Related to ACA networking enhancement New feature or request investigating currently looking into the issue labels Sep 14, 2022
@kendallroden kendallroden removed the investigating currently looking into the issue label Nov 2, 2022
@anthonychu anthonychu added the roadmap This feature is on the roadmap label Jan 6, 2023
@cachai2 cachai2 self-assigned this Mar 6, 2023
@torosent
Copy link
Member

supported for single revision

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Networking Related to ACA networking roadmap This feature is on the roadmap
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants