Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

All Trigger Types Not Available in IntelliJ IDEA IDE while adding the additional function to existing Java Azure Functions Project #2228

Closed
mike-urnun-msft opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@mike-urnun-msft
Copy link

Plugin name and version

Maven plugins for Azure Functions

<plugin> <groupId>com.microsoft.azure</groupId> <artifactId>azure-functions-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>[Use the latest version above]</version> </plugin>

Plugin configuration in your pom.xml

Expected behavior

Whereas in VS Code, I can see the same scenario but I'm able to get all types of triggers by changing Template Filter: 
IntelliJIdea 
I cannot see the same template filter in IntelliJ IDEA IDE to see all the trigger or normally only 3 types of triggers available to add into the existing Java Project. 

Actual behavior

But when we try to add the blob or Queue trigger to the existing Azure Functions Java Project, unable to see other than only 3 types of triggers:

image

Steps to reproduce the problem

When We create New Azure Functions (Java) Project in the IntelliJ IDEA IDE, able to get most of the triggers: image 

Reported by @PravallikaKothaveerannagari: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs#105223

@Flanker32
Copy link
Member

@mike-urnun-msft Thanks for your report, currently we are working on this feature, IntelliJ toolkits will share the same Function template as maven plugin in next release, which will be done at the end of February,

@mike-urnun-msft
Copy link
Author

@mike-urnun-msft Thanks for your report, currently we are working on this feature, IntelliJ toolkits will share the same Function template as maven plugin in next release, which will be done at the end of February,

Thanks, @Flanker32! @PravallikaKothaveerannagari I hope the answer above brings clarity & helps with the planning. I'm going to close this issue. If you have any additional concerns, please let me know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants