Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The website should link to the Arm64 Windows version #7982

Closed
3 tasks done
prayaas-a opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done

The website should link to the Arm64 Windows version #7982

prayaas-a opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
✅ duplicate Issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@prayaas-a
Copy link

Preflight Checklist

Storage Explorer Version

1.34.0

Regression From

No response

Architecture

arm64

Storage Explorer Build Number

No response

Platform

Windows

OS Version

No response

Bug Description

The download site should link to the Windows Arm64 version at the very least. Ideally, it should only have one Windows button and auto-detect architecture. You can find sample code here.

Steps to Reproduce

Visit the Azure Storage Explorer site. Click Download > Windows on a Windows Arm64 machine

Actual Experience

The x64 version downloads

Expected Experience

The Arm64 version should download, or at least a link to it should be present

Additional Context

No response

@craxal craxal added the ✅ duplicate Issue or pull request already exists label Jun 6, 2024
@craxal
Copy link
Contributor

craxal commented Jun 6, 2024

@prayaas-a Windows ARM64 is currently in preview. We have a work item for adding an ARM64 download option to the page when it becomes generally available. In the meantime, you can always download from our GitHub releases page.

Duplicate of #7958

@craxal craxal closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✅ duplicate Issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants