You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sure, not all monospace fonts have the support for APL (and other languages that use a few Unicode mathematical symbols for programming), so I wonder if Cascadia Code should support it? It has been discussed in some font repos (Ref: [1][2][3]), and I bet if programmers really wanted use this sometime in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd argue for math symbols independently of APL, e.g. I sometimes write simple math into text files for note-taking. Although it does work (because the font uses a fallback AFAIK), it sometimes looks really bad compared to other fonts, which is why I am currently merging the missing symbols from other fonts manually. It would be nice to get inbuilt support for that.
Examples for math symbols I frequently use and are missing from Cascadia include ∀ (U+2200), ⊂ (U+2282), or ± (U+00B1)
Description of the new feature/enhancement
Sure, not all monospace fonts have the support for APL (and other languages that use a few Unicode mathematical symbols for programming), so I wonder if Cascadia Code should support it? It has been discussed in some font repos (Ref: [1] [2] [3]), and I bet if programmers really wanted use this sometime in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: