Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: One App for Makers and One for Admins #5991

Closed
bhavikj65 opened this issue Jul 4, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels
coe-starter-kit CoE Starter Kit issues documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@bhavikj65
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

No response

Describe the solution you'd like

Since the CoE kit is built on Dataverse, I believe that having a single app for Makers and a distinct app for Admins would be preferable to having many apps for various use cases. like Command cetner, Inactivity, DLP, Developer compliance etc.

One app for makers and another for administrators will make it more cost-effective since it's challenging to distribute these applications with a sizable community of makers, especially in business contexts, and because all of these apps are premium and require licencing.

Describe alternatives you've considered

N/A

Additional context?

No response

@bhavikj65 bhavikj65 added coe-starter-kit CoE Starter Kit issues enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 4, 2023
@bhavikj65 bhavikj65 changed the title [CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: FEATURE TITLE [CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: One Maker and another Admin app Jul 4, 2023
@bhavikj65 bhavikj65 changed the title [CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: One Maker and another Admin app [CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: One App for Makers and One for Admins Jul 4, 2023
@manuelap-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the feedback!

It's not on our roadmap to implement this, mostly because

  1. Not all customers use all the parts of the CoE kit and with one app it'd be difficult to enable customers to adopt different parts of the CoE kit at their own pace
  2. For admins, we often see organizations split responsibilities between different personas (e.g. a Support Admin that looks after Inactivity/Orphan clean up, an InfoSec admin that looks after compliance) and they would experience a very noisy and busy app if everything was in one
  3. Especially for admins, the app would be very busy and likely suffer performance issues

However, as we have now moved to mainly using custom pages (aside from a few apps that are still missing the re-design but are on our backlog), it would be very easy to implement a "one" app approach yourself. You could create a new model driven app and add all our custom pages and table views to the navigation and group it the way you'd like to use it. This should be quite simple, and would also work for future upgrades etc.

I'll add this to our documentation backlog, so we can document this step by step in our "extend the CoE kit" article.

@manuelap-msft manuelap-msft added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 4, 2023
@bhavikj65
Copy link
Author

Great, Thanks!

@CoEStarterKitBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bhavikj65 This has been fixed in the latest release. Please install the latest version of the toolkit following the instructions for installing updates. Note that if you do not remove the unmanaged layers as described there you will not receive updates from us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
coe-starter-kit CoE Starter Kit issues documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants