You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No response
Describe the solution you'd like
Since the CoE kit is built on Dataverse, I believe that having a single app for Makers and a distinct app for Admins would be preferable to having many apps for various use cases. like Command cetner, Inactivity, DLP, Developer compliance etc.
One app for makers and another for administrators will make it more cost-effective since it's challenging to distribute these applications with a sizable community of makers, especially in business contexts, and because all of these apps are premium and require licencing.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bhavikj65
changed the title
[CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: FEATURE TITLE
[CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: One Maker and another Admin app
Jul 4, 2023
bhavikj65
changed the title
[CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: One Maker and another Admin app
[CoE Starter Kit - Feature]: One App for Makers and One for Admins
Jul 4, 2023
It's not on our roadmap to implement this, mostly because
Not all customers use all the parts of the CoE kit and with one app it'd be difficult to enable customers to adopt different parts of the CoE kit at their own pace
For admins, we often see organizations split responsibilities between different personas (e.g. a Support Admin that looks after Inactivity/Orphan clean up, an InfoSec admin that looks after compliance) and they would experience a very noisy and busy app if everything was in one
Especially for admins, the app would be very busy and likely suffer performance issues
However, as we have now moved to mainly using custom pages (aside from a few apps that are still missing the re-design but are on our backlog), it would be very easy to implement a "one" app approach yourself. You could create a new model driven app and add all our custom pages and table views to the navigation and group it the way you'd like to use it. This should be quite simple, and would also work for future upgrades etc.
I'll add this to our documentation backlog, so we can document this step by step in our "extend the CoE kit" article.
@bhavikj65 This has been fixed in the latest release. Please install the latest version of the toolkit following the instructions for installing updates. Note that if you do not remove the unmanaged layers as described there you will not receive updates from us.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No response
Describe the solution you'd like
Since the CoE kit is built on Dataverse, I believe that having a single app for Makers and a distinct app for Admins would be preferable to having many apps for various use cases. like Command cetner, Inactivity, DLP, Developer compliance etc.
One app for makers and another for administrators will make it more cost-effective since it's challenging to distribute these applications with a sizable community of makers, especially in business contexts, and because all of these apps are premium and require licencing.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: