Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Client-side encryption capabilities with KeyVault integration #440

Closed
mschmieder opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Client-side encryption capabilities with KeyVault integration #440

mschmieder opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Documentation Requires documentation

Comments

@mschmieder
Copy link

User story
Reading through the currently available documentation, it is not clear if there is any encryption mechanism provided that is suitable for handling PHI. In order to use this promising backend service we would need some client-side encryption mechanisms for the AzureBlobStorage as well as for the SQL Server.

For the Blob-Storage the Standard encryption with KeyVault integration that is available within the dotnet-stack would be sufficient
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-client-side-encryption?tabs=dotnet

For the database-side using SQL Always Encrypted would be the preferred way of handling PHI.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/security/encryption/always-encrypted-database-engine?view=sql-server-ver15

Are there any plans to integrate this into this project?

@smithago smithago added the Documentation Requires documentation label Nov 20, 2020
@smithago smithago assigned smithago and moiradillon12 and unassigned smithago Nov 20, 2020
@Kiechlus
Copy link

Any news on this feature? Would be great to have it.

@StevenBorg
Copy link
Contributor

@Kiechlus and @mschmieder, I apologize for the delay. Let me look into this more closely and get back to you. Thanks for your patience, and thank you so much for taking the time to comment and provide feedback.

@smithago
Copy link
Contributor

close as stale

@KarlKl
Copy link

KarlKl commented Jan 19, 2023

I am also interested in this feature. Has this feature been implemented in the meantime? Or is it supported by default?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Requires documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants