Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backwards compatibility for Durable Functions in-process #17

Open
cgillum opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Backwards compatibility for Durable Functions in-process #17

cgillum opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request P2

Comments

@cgillum
Copy link
Member

cgillum commented Apr 27, 2022

Users of today's Durable Functions may want to migrate their code to the .NET Isolated worker. To make this migration process easier, we should consider adding backwards compatibility support. This would ideally be implemented as a set of alternate interfaces that users can bind to whose implementations call into the "modern" APIs. These back-compat interfaces should also be isolated into a separate namespace, like Microsoft.DurableTask.Compatibility.Functions.

@cgillum cgillum added this to the Public Preview milestone Apr 27, 2022
@lilyjma lilyjma added P2 Enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request P2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants