You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Farmvibes Team,
While running whatif.ipynb notebook I received input validation errors: 1) The scenario must contain at least 2 crop year
2) Input requires at least one simulation scenario (not named 'Current' or 'Baseline').The input parser found 0.
Because of this "farm_ai/carbon_local/carbon_whatif" workflow execution got failed.
Alternate method I tried:
When I add one more year(2021) in scenario.json the workflow executed successfully and I get the value of carbon sequestration as an output.
I have attached modified scenario.json that makes workflow to execute successfully.
I would appreciate your feedback on whether my approach is correct ?
COMET has recently started requesting two years of data for estimating the amount of carbon sequestrated.
For running the notebook with the example json files provided in the repo, replicating the year in scenario.json will allow the workflow to be executed successfully. In practice, these scenarios should cover farming and cultivation practices considered by the farmer in their analysis.
In the next release, we will alter the contents of the example files provided in the notebook (in particular, scenario.json) to include an additional year of data.
Dear Farmvibes Team,
While running whatif.ipynb notebook I received input validation errors:
1) The scenario must contain at least 2 crop year
2) Input requires at least one simulation scenario (not named 'Current' or 'Baseline').The input parser found 0.
Because of this "farm_ai/carbon_local/carbon_whatif" workflow execution got failed.
Alternate method I tried:
When I add one more year(2021) in scenario.json the workflow executed successfully and I get the value of carbon sequestration as an output.
I have attached modified scenario.json that makes workflow to execute successfully.
I would appreciate your feedback on whether my approach is correct ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: