Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate-converged-pkg: removes options for Jest config #20760

Open
layershifter opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 16 comments
Open

migrate-converged-pkg: removes options for Jest config #20760

layershifter opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 16 comments

Comments

@layershifter
Copy link
Member

I ran generator for @fluentui/make-styles-webpack-loader and get failures on CI:

image

This happens because generator removes config options from jest.config.js:

image

@Hotell
Copy link
Contributor

Hotell commented Nov 25, 2021

thanks for report!

yes this is "expected" as we don't use AST updates for this config right now. Should be addressed in future work.

@msft-fluent-ui-bot msft-fluent-ui-bot added the Resolution: Soft Close Soft closing inactive issues over a certain period label May 24, 2022
@msft-fluent-ui-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

V-Build - @microsoft/fluentui-react-build automation moved this from Backlog to Done May 24, 2022
@layershifter layershifter reopened this May 24, 2022
V-Build - @microsoft/fluentui-react-build automation moved this from Done to Triage May 24, 2022
@msft-fluent-ui-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@Hotell Hotell reopened this Nov 22, 2022
@layershifter layershifter removed the Resolution: Soft Close Soft closing inactive issues over a certain period label Jan 23, 2023
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

1 similar comment
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Resolution: Soft Close Soft closing inactive issues over a certain period labels Aug 25, 2023
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

1 similar comment
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

2 similar comments
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

4 similar comments
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@microsoft-github-policy-service

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

@layershifter layershifter reopened this Aug 28, 2023
@layershifter layershifter removed the Resolution: Soft Close Soft closing inactive issues over a certain period label Aug 28, 2023
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Resolution: Soft Close Soft closing inactive issues over a certain period label Feb 25, 2024

Because this issue has not had activity for over 180 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.

Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants