We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Double.NaN should be treated as 0.0.
I would expect, for example, that new DateTimeStamp(0.0).add(Double.NaN).equals(new DateTimeStamp(0.0)) to be true.
new DateTimeStamp(0.0).add(Double.NaN).equals(new DateTimeStamp(0.0))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I will take this up . Assign it to me.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Added pull request #50
anantk24
No branches or pull requests
Double.NaN should be treated as 0.0.
I would expect, for example, that
new DateTimeStamp(0.0).add(Double.NaN).equals(new DateTimeStamp(0.0))
to be true.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: