Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve performance at the presence of malware scanners #32

Closed
ecki opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve performance at the presence of malware scanners #32

ecki opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ecki
Copy link

ecki commented Apr 22, 2021

Summary

Java run- and build-times environment on Windows are especially badly affected by on-access malware scanners which are mandatory on many organizations systems. The fact that large number of jar (aka zip) files are involved and exceptionally bad handling of reading and writing archives in most (all?) scanner products (including defender) really can slow a maven build or application server startup down.

Basic example

Running a maven build on larger project, starting Eclipse or Karaf runtime...

Motivation

Developers on Windows often have to stick to malware scanners and excludes are risky (and do not always help due to some heuristics of malware and endpoint scanners)

Unfortunatelly I don’t have a good answer how to fix it, maybe besides having new APIs for controlling scanners and simply providing a scanner which works better for those java workloads?

@ecki ecki added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 22, 2021
@ecki
Copy link
Author

ecki commented Apr 22, 2021

Hm, maybe related or duplicate of #9?

@brunoborges
Copy link
Member

Indeed a duplicate. We will focus on #9.

@brunoborges brunoborges closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 22, 2023
@brunoborges brunoborges added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Mar 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants