You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What would you like to be added:
For now, some user may confuse what's the input and the output of nni.
Such as NAS, shall we format one output format(output model? config? ) so that user won't confuse.
Why is this needed:
Without this feature, how does current nni work:
Components that may involve changes:
Brief description of your proposal if any:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For NAS, the derivation of final architecture is what is needed. For most algorithms, this post-processing might not be easy. So yes. I agree that an API should be designed to obtain the final model for user.
What would you like to be added:
For now, some user may confuse what's the input and the output of nni.
Such as NAS, shall we format one output format(output model? config? ) so that user won't confuse.
Why is this needed:
Without this feature, how does current nni work:
Components that may involve changes:
Brief description of your proposal if any:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: