Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do you have plan for SuperNova? #120

Closed
SuccinctPaul opened this issue Dec 31, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Do you have plan for SuperNova? #120

SuccinctPaul opened this issue Dec 31, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@SuccinctPaul
Copy link

I've heard you have a newest protocol named SuperNova. https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370.pdf

  • Do you have a plan to impl? when?
@srinathsetty
Copy link
Collaborator

We will implement it in the near future. Thanks for your interest!

@huitseeker huitseeker mentioned this issue May 29, 2023
Open
@matthiasgoergens
Copy link

Has the near future arrived, yet?

@wyattbenno777
Copy link

I started this in a fork. I plan on using the NIFS code that already exists.
It seems like most of the work will be around the selector, mux, and WRITE functions.

R1CS is first but I am following closely on the PSE CCS implementation.

https://github.com/wyattbenno777/SuperNova/tree/supernova

Let me know if someone is already doing this! 🙏

huitseeker pushed a commit to huitseeker/Nova that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2023
@adr1anh
SuperNova: Improve circuit (microsoft#120)
62ed491 
* Function computing num RO inputs

* Use instance selector
Comments

* Docstrings

* More efficient selector computation
Fix test

* fix lints

* Remove special case in selector

* Fix digest computation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@matthiasgoergens @wyattbenno777 @srinathsetty @SuccinctPaul