New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What's the difference between using bi-gram directly and the proposed loss function? #18

Open

nickcom007 opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 0 comments

nickcom007 commented Jul 8, 2020 •

edited

When n=2, why not use bi-gram directly for the loss? It will save a lot of computation cost.
What is the difference if all weights α_{n = 0?}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment