We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It looks like it's using the wrong line
is actually the highlighting for this line in the same file
This part of large multi root workspace so I don't have a small reproducer yet unfortunately.
These are the logs that refer to the file, is there anything else in the logs I should look out for?
[Info - 4:06:32 pm] (17668) [BG(18)] Long operation: getSemanticTokens full at path/to/file.py (5427ms) [Info - 4:06:44 pm] (17668) [BG(18)] Long operation: checking: path/to/file.py (2395ms) [Info - 4:06:44 pm] (17668) [BG(18)] Long operation: analyzing: path/to/file.py (2656ms) (17668) [BG(12)] analyzing: path/to/file.py ... (17668) [BG(12)] parsing: path/to/file.py (55ms) (17668) [BG(12)] binding: path/to/file.py (1ms) (17668) [BG(12)] checking: path/to/file.py ... (17668) [BG(12)] checking: path/to/file.py (1015ms) (17668) [BG(12)] analyzing: path/to/file.py (1684ms) (17668) [BG(18)] analyzing: path/to/file.py ... (17668) [BG(18)] parsing: path/to/file.py (160ms) (17668) [BG(18)] binding: path/to/file.py (3ms) (17668) [BG(18)] checking: path/to/file.py ... (17668) [BG(12)] indexing: path/to/file.py [found 6] (0ms) (17668) Indexing Done: path/to/file.py (17668) [FG] parsing: path/to/file.py (66ms) (17668) [FG] binding: path/to/file.py (2ms) (17668) [BG(18)] checking: path/to/file.py (2959ms) [Info - 4:16:21 pm] (17668) [BG(18)] Long operation: checking: path/to/file.py (2959ms) (17668) [BG(18)] analyzing: path/to/file.py (3286ms) [Info - 4:16:21 pm] (17668) [BG(18)] Long operation: analyzing: path/to/file.py (3286ms)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Potentially duplicate of #3649. Rolling back to v2022.11.20 seems to have fixed it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This might be related to this issue. fix coming in next week's pre-release. #3652
he meant next release which is next week.
This issue has been fixed in prerelease version 2022.11.41, which we've just released. You can find the changelog here: CHANGELOG.md
No branches or pull requests
Environment data
Code Snippet
It looks like it's using the wrong line
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5975405/203464685-8c46cd5e-08a5-4a9c-b626-5873e9e405b0.png)
is actually the highlighting for this line in the same file
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5975405/203464790-0bea65a4-1e6d-424f-b2f3-06548d7058d1.png)
This part of large multi root workspace so I don't have a small reproducer yet unfortunately.
These are the logs that refer to the file, is there anything else in the logs I should look out for?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: