Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 4, 2023. It is now read-only.

About img augmentation #29

Closed
w19787 opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

About img augmentation #29

w19787 opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@w19787
Copy link

w19787 commented Jun 16, 2020

there is img augmentation for moving image. Is it ok to apply same augmentation to the fixed image? I am asking this question since in my case, the dataset is much smaller, if there is no concern, I will try to add augmentation for both images.

image

@zsyzzsoft
Copy link
Collaborator

zsyzzsoft commented Jun 16, 2020

Yes, but should be careful about how the point1 will be augmented along with the fixed image. An inverse field should be computed.

@w19787
Copy link
Author

w19787 commented Jun 19, 2020

Yes, but should be careful about how the point1 will be augmented along with the fixed image. An inverse field should be computed.

i am not sure i understand what you say. if i apply same code as follows to fixed image(img1), what will be problem?

augImg1 = augmentation(preprocessedImg1)
augSeg1 = augmentation(seg1)
augPt1 = augmenetation_pts(point1)

@zsyzzsoft
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry I was wrong that here we don't have a flow to worry about. This seems very OK!

@w19787
Copy link
Author

w19787 commented Jun 22, 2020

Sorry I was wrong that here we don't have a flow to worry about. This seems very OK!

thanks for kind confirmation!

@w19787 w19787 closed this as completed Jun 22, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants