Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filter actions that require customer action #31

Closed
ghost opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Filter actions that require customer action #31

ghost opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 23, 2020

Feature Request

Is your feature request related to a problem?
As a partner I am frustrated when I see a list of actions to perform, that cannot be done without interacting with the customer.

Describe the solution you would like
The list of actions to be performed should have additional context to give us insights into whether or not an action can be taken without connecting with a customer first.

@ghost ghost added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 23, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to To Do in v1.1 via automation Jun 23, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to To Do in v1.2 Jul 13, 2020
@ghost ghost removed this from To Do in v1.1 Jul 13, 2020
@ghost ghost removed this from To Do in v1.2 Jul 16, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to To Do in v1.3 Jul 16, 2020
@ghost ghost removed this from To Do in v1.3 Aug 18, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to To Do in v2.0 Aug 18, 2020
@ghost ghost changed the title Filter actions Filter actions that require customer action Sep 1, 2020
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 1, 2020

[Triage] - Updating the title to remove any confusion associated with this request. Also, there is already the ability to define a list of tenants that are excluded from the measure of a specific control

@ghost ghost self-assigned this Sep 1, 2020
@ghost ghost removed this from To Do in v2.0 Sep 3, 2020
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 16, 2020

Closing this feature because the planning for the connector is heading a different direction.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Sep 16, 2020
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants