Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Applying GNN-FiLM to dependency parsing #1

Open
LifeIsStrange opened this issue Aug 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Applying GNN-FiLM to dependency parsing #1

LifeIsStrange opened this issue Aug 12, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@LifeIsStrange
Copy link

LifeIsStrange commented Aug 12, 2019

Hi!
I am just a fan of state of the art, not an NLP researcher.

I found on NLP-progress this SOTA result on dependency parsing using GNN.
https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1237
Source: https://github.com/sebastianruder/NLP-progress/blob/master/english/dependency_parsing.md

I believe they use a GAT, and they claim to be the first to use a GNN for this fundamental NLP task.

I was thinking that, you made what seems to be like a major, task generic advance in GNNs, and that it would be interesting for you to make a collaboration with those researchers.

@LifeIsStrange
Copy link
Author

They reach 97.3 in POS, 95.97 in UAS and 94.31 in LAS.
I dream of the day NLP tasks will have 99,99 % performance, and this collaboration could (I am maybe saying bullshit) make us closer to that goal: making NLP reliable.

@LifeIsStrange
Copy link
Author

@mmjb

@mmjb
Copy link
Contributor

mmjb commented Aug 13, 2019

This is an interesting idea, though I don't think that I'll have the time to include this dataset in the evaluation here anytime soon. I tried to have a look at the implementation listed in the paper, but the linked repository (https://github.com/AntNLP/gnn-dep-parsing) seems to not exist / be private. A first step may be to contact the authors to actually publish their code :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants