Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[libosmscout] qt backend #31891

Closed
playgithub opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #32023
Closed

[libosmscout] qt backend #31891

playgithub opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #32023
Assignees
Labels
category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist

Comments

@playgithub
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

No

Proposed solution

add qt backend

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

Now

$ ./vcpkg search libosmscout
libosmscout              1.1.1#2          libosmscout offers applications simple, high-level interfaces for offline ...
libosmscout[cairo]                        Cairo backend renderer
libosmscout[directx]                      Direct2D backend renderer
libosmscout[gdi]                          GDI+ backend renderer
libosmscout[svg]                          SVG backend renderer

Just add libosmscout[qt6]

@playgithub playgithub added the category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist label Jun 8, 2023
@playgithub
Copy link
Contributor Author

libosmscout supports both Qt5 and Qt6.
It supports Qt5 in cmake, and Qt6 in meson.

$ ./vcpkg search libosmscout
...
libosmscout[qt]                           Enable build of Qt map drawing backend
...

Better to be libosmscout[qt5]?

@dg0yt
Copy link
Contributor

dg0yt commented Jun 19, 2023

Which build system is going to stay, cmake or meson?

@playgithub
Copy link
Contributor Author

Which build system is going to stay, cmake or meson?

The author prefers meson, Framstag/libosmscout#1438

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants