Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vscode-wasm is already a name of a popular VSCode Wasm extension. Rename this repo? #62

Open
syrusakbary opened this issue May 1, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@syrusakbary
Copy link

First of all... great work on the project.

It came for my realization that you are using the same name vscode-wasm as another extension that is widely popular and used in VSCode: vscode-wasm, which has been around already for a few years.

https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=dtsvet.vscode-wasm
https://github.com/wasmerio/vscode-wasm

Having the same name might be confusing for users, so I want to suggest renaming this repo to something else (vscode-wasm-extensions could be a good name, but really anything other than vscode-wasm could work) so we minimize confusion between repos.

Note: this issue came after some discussion in HN. I think is fair to assume good intent, and give the opportunity for maintainers to work on a fix: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35768888

@syrusakbary syrusakbary changed the title Rename the repo? vscode-wasm is already a name of a popular VSCode Wasm extension. Rename this repo? May 1, 2023
@dbaeumer
Copy link
Member

dbaeumer commented May 1, 2023

@syrusakbary thanks for reaching out. The name vscode-wasm is only for the GitHub repository. The extensions will be named very likely ms-vscode.wasm-wasi-core and the npm package to use its API will very likely be called @vscode/wasm-wasi. So I think from a VS Code user perspective there will be no name clash.

@syrusakbary
Copy link
Author

syrusakbary commented May 1, 2023

Thanks for the quick response!

Yeah, I was aware the name is just for the repo.
If people search for vscode wasm in Google now they would have two repos with exactly the same name that do two very different things, which I think could be confusing for newcomers to the ecosystem. Hence creating the issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants