Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't use remoteCredentialsService when client specified a secretStorageProvider #190781

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 18, 2023

Conversation

TylerLeonhardt
Copy link
Member

This is a temporary fix for #190537

until we clean up the last of the CredentialsService (which should be in debt week in Sept).

If the client embedder declared a secretStorageProvider, they likely don't want the old credentialsProvider to go over the remote connection... so we use an in-memory provider instead.

Fixed #190537

…torageProvider`

This is a temporary fix for #190537

until we clean up the last of the CredentialsService (which should be in debt week in Sept).

If the client embedder declared a secretStorageProvider, they likely don't want the old credentialsProvider to go over the remote connection... so we use an in-memory provider instead.

Fixed #190537
@TylerLeonhardt TylerLeonhardt enabled auto-merge (squash) August 18, 2023 22:48
@TylerLeonhardt TylerLeonhardt self-assigned this Aug 18, 2023
@VSCodeTriageBot VSCodeTriageBot added this to the August 2023 milestone Aug 18, 2023
@TylerLeonhardt TylerLeonhardt merged commit 6562544 into main Aug 18, 2023
6 checks passed
@TylerLeonhardt TylerLeonhardt deleted the tyler/academic-gazelle branch August 18, 2023 23:03
Krzysztof-Cieslak pushed a commit to githubnext/vscode that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
…torageProvider` (microsoft#190781)

* Don't use `remoteCredentialsService` when client specified a `secretStorageProvider`

This is a temporary fix for microsoft#190537

until we clean up the last of the CredentialsService (which should be in debt week in Sept).

If the client embedder declared a secretStorageProvider, they likely don't want the old credentialsProvider to go over the remote connection... so we use an in-memory provider instead.

Fixed microsoft#190537

* remove stale comment
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tunnels stuck at resolving authority in latest insiders
3 participants