-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 814
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion - publish a roadmap #48
Comments
+1 |
+1, definitely |
Found this, probably the list is prioritize: |
+1, we don't know where we are now, where we are going now. |
This is a great suggestion. Two part answer:
We’re building out a test framework that, along with some visualization, should provide a decent sense of what works and what doesn’t. The (basic) test framework should be in place this/next week, with the visualization stuff still being built out (so that’ll take a bit longer). And, of course, the framework will need to be properly populated with tests, which will be an ongoing process.
Priorities are largely influenced by apps, partners, and feedback received here. But (per the above comment) this lists the “big picture” priorities: https://github.com/Microsoft/WinObjC/wiki#whats-still-under-development Additionally, going forward we’ll mark issues appropriately to denote that they're "in progress" to give you a sense of what’s coming in the near/medium term. |
That's good to know. A visualization of the gaps would be useful. |
@joewood if an issue is unassigned then you're free to run with it |
All sounds good but we need a picture of a layout map |
We're working on web tools to provide exactly this functionality – you'll be able to see what's supported now, what we're working on and even upload your app for a fast analysis of how compatible with the iOS bridge it is. However, we need IPAs to test our pipeline out with, so if you want to support the project, we're accepting submissions here: https://dev.windows.com/bridges/ios/app-submission Stay tuned! |
Check out the new and improved Wiki for a high-level view of what we're working on: |
That's great. Just a suggestion - it would be useful to annotate the features with future prospective version numbers like the TypeScript team do. Although this may be tentative, it's a good way of understanding relative priorities and complexity. |
It would be great if you could publish a roadmap, what's a priority for the team and what areas you're looking for the community to contribute.
The model used by the TypeScript team (and others) seems to work well, where GH issues are tagged as "accepting PRs" and a roadmap is published and kept to the date.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: