You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
Not so much a bug but a question
In this of the ESP8266 example are you considering RL = 5K? Because the example code is still defaulting to 10K? If the MQ sensor already had a 10K as RL then by adding the voltage divider to "AO" (which is in parallel to "RL" of 10K) aren't you making RL effectively ~3.33K? To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Go to '...'
Click on '....'
Scroll down to '....'
See error
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Desktop (please complete the following information):
OS: [e.g. iOS]
Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
Version [e.g. 22]
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Device: [e.g. iPhone6]
OS: [e.g. iOS8.1]
Browser [e.g. stock browser, safari]
Version [e.g. 22]
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bvernham raises a valid point. To avoid reducing the effective RL, the second voltage divider (for level shifting down from 5v to 3.3v) should employ high impedance.
A 100k/200k combination would be better than the (1.7k/3.3k) combination in the diagram.
I have verified the 100k/200k combination works fine for esp32c3.
Describe the bug
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/5819349/288063537-f8433585-8e4f-4423-a482-909da42a18b9.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.NdNsoUcN2C5eUZA9IdbvR2rTlnu1dvRqRvxe97eAWvA)
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
Not so much a bug but a question
In this of the ESP8266 example are you considering RL = 5K? Because the example code is still defaulting to 10K? If the MQ sensor already had a 10K as RL then by adding the voltage divider to "AO" (which is in parallel to "RL" of 10K) aren't you making RL effectively ~3.33K?
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: