You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, your project jfc(commit id: ceae86e) requires "halo==0.0.31" in its dependency. After analyzing the source code, we found that the following versions of halo can also be suitable, i.e., halo 0.0.30, since all functions that you directly (1 APIs: halo.halo.Halo.init) or indirectly (propagate to 8 halo's internal APIs and 6 outsider APIs) used from the package have not been changed in these versions, thus not affecting your usage.
Therefore, we believe that it is quite safe to loose your dependency on halo from "halo==0.0.31" to "halo>=0.0.30,<=0.0.31". This will improve the applicability of jfc and reduce the possibility of any further dependency conflict with other projects.
May I pull a request to further loosen the dependency on halo?
By the way, could you please tell us whether such an automatic tool for dependency analysis may be potentially helpful for maintaining dependencies easier during your development?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jfc is not a library, it's a binary for end-use, in a sense. So, while doing something like you suggest could make sense for something to be integrated in other applications, in this case I would rather pin a version and controllingly upgrade the dependencies in a PATCH release (as has happened).
This being said, this message feels very automated (and almost certainly is, based on your activity profile), and hence borderline spam-like. If you're trying to kickstart/sell/pitch some service, this might not be the best way to go about it.
Hi, your project jfc(commit id: ceae86e) requires "halo==0.0.31" in its dependency. After analyzing the source code, we found that the following versions of halo can also be suitable, i.e., halo 0.0.30, since all functions that you directly (1 APIs: halo.halo.Halo.init) or indirectly (propagate to 8 halo's internal APIs and 6 outsider APIs) used from the package have not been changed in these versions, thus not affecting your usage.
Therefore, we believe that it is quite safe to loose your dependency on halo from "halo==0.0.31" to "halo>=0.0.30,<=0.0.31". This will improve the applicability of jfc and reduce the possibility of any further dependency conflict with other projects.
May I pull a request to further loosen the dependency on halo?
By the way, could you please tell us whether such an automatic tool for dependency analysis may be potentially helpful for maintaining dependencies easier during your development?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: