Missing emojis

[LosTigeros]

I can't find any details about these emojis:

[milesj]

@LosTigeros Because some of these aren't real emojis.

• A-Z are regional indicators and are used to create flag emojis. They aren't stand alone emojis. https://emojipedia.org/regional-indicator-symbol-letter-a/
• Skin tones are used as modifiers. They aren't stand alone emojis. https://emojipedia.org/emoji-modifier-fitzpatrick-type-1-2/
• Skier skin tones are not supported. https://emojipedia.org/skier-type-3/
• 109 Shibuya isn't supported. https://emojipedia.org/shibuya/

However, i'll look into the following.

• Eye speech bubble. https://emojipedia.org/eye-in-speech-bubble/
• Man/Woman in tuxedo. https://emojipedia.org/man-in-tuxedo/
• Levitating suit skin tones. https://emojipedia.org/man-in-business-suit-levitating/

[milesj]

Those 3 emojis at the bottom do exist in the datasets. Gonna close this now.

[zeratax]

I personally think regional indicators should be considered emoji, but I understand that this isn't so clear cut.

They have both Emoji=Yes and Emoji_Presentation=Yes,

but they also do have Emoji_Component=Yes
But I don't think that this necessarily precludes them from usage. Previously linked emojipedia also does not list A-Z regional indicators as non RGI.

and most importantly most other vendors seem to use them as emoji.

I personally use the element messenger, which uses this library and now seems incomplete in comparison to e.g. discord.

[milesj]

@zeratax Yeah a lot has changed in the last 2 years. Open to including them in the next major.

[milesj]

@zeratax Looked into this. Since these emojis should be hidden from the consumer, none of them have localized annotations/tags/etc to use, which results in all these datasets being incorrect. This turned out to... not be an easy change.

[milesj]

Messing around with it here: #66

[zeratax]

ah wow looks great!

[LosTigeros]

Aye! That's a good change 👍