Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the angle of rbox #20

Closed
lz20061213 opened this issue Mar 5, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

About the angle of rbox #20

lz20061213 opened this issue Mar 5, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@lz20061213
Copy link

Thanks great work!
I have a question about the angle of rbox:
In the paper, i find the angle regression term is CodeCogsEqn. Does the angle of GT rbox (for example, HRSC2016 dataset) in this paper ranges from -90 to 90?

@ming71
Copy link
Owner

ming71 commented Mar 26, 2021

thanks for your attention. The angle range in this implementation is (-45 , 45]

@lz20061213
Copy link
Author

:( Thanks, I still cofused about the definitation about GT angle. As i see, there has many represtations:

  1. opencv, form R3Det, range [-90, 0), but the width of a ship will not be the largest side
  2. straightforward, range from [0, 360), direction of a ship with x-axis, anticlockwise, the width is largest side, height another
  3. ...
    if the GT angle is [-90, 0) or (-45, 45],how to judge the direction?

@ming71
Copy link
Owner

ming71 commented Mar 26, 2021

The angle value uniquely determines the oriented rectangle under a specific definition method. In addition, the meaning of the angle value under different definition methods is also different.

@lz20061213
Copy link
Author

angle

That's right,but in such situation, is the angle same for 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4)?

@ming71
Copy link
Owner

ming71 commented Mar 26, 2021

1=2, 3=4, 2!=3

@lz20061213
Copy link
Author

1=2, 3=4, 2!=3

Got it. Thanks a lot!

@ming71 ming71 closed this as completed Aug 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants