Fix visibility card view

[benekex2]

Resolves #4137

I want to merge this change because...

Screenshots

Pull Request Checklist

1. Privileged views and APIs are guarded by proper permission checks.
2. All visible strings are translated with proper context.
3. All data-formatting is locale-aware (dates, numbers, and so on).
4. Database queries are optimized and the number of queries is constant.
5. Database migration files are up to date.
6. The changes are tested.
7. The code is documented (docstrings, project documentation).
8. GraphQL schema and type definitions are up to date.
9. Changes are mentioned in the changelog.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4198 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.77%   91.77%           
=======================================
  Files         278      278           
  Lines       15548    15548           
  Branches     1513     1513           
=======================================
  Hits        14269    14269           
  Misses        879      879           
  Partials      400      400

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 57510b3...c60440f. Read the comment docs.

[maarcingebala]

I've spotted one wording issue - if the publication date is set in the past and you'll change the switch to "hidden" you'll get the message that is logically incorrect "Will be visible on ":

Maybe we'd have to check if visibility is set to "hidden" and the publication date is in the past, then we should simply say "hidden"?

Requested changes were made.