-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong license quoted in LICENSE file #100
Comments
The LICENSE file is auto generated by Dist::Zilla::Plugin::LicenseFromModule, and the actual text boils down to https://metacpan.org/pod/Software::License::Perl_5 and it should be changed there rather than changing it in this module. For me "same as Perl" refers to GPL 2 + Artistic 1, though I see what you mean by the differences between Artistic 1 vs Artistic 1 (Perl). |
I see. It's already tracked at Perl-Toolchain-Gang/Software-License#32.
To be precise, with "Artistic 1" do you mean the 8-item https://spdx.org/licenses/Artistic-1.0.html license and with "GPL 2" do you mean GPL 2.0 version only without any future versions? Could you please record your intention somewhere into the distribution, so that future users can understand what license terms actually apply? |
I do not care which one you refer to. You can pick whichever is more permissive.
My intention is that it's the same license as Perl 5, whatever that means. |
A LICENSE file attempts to quote an Artistic License
Carmel/LICENSE
Line 273 in 478c98c
That's confusing because same LICENSE file at the top refers to Perl 5 licenses
Carmel/LICENSE
Line 4 in 478c98c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: