Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The pretrained model performance is worse than the paper claimed #1

Closed
Godricly opened this issue Sep 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@Godricly
Copy link

Hi,
I tested your pretrained VGG 16 model on ICDAR2015 with no parameters change. The following is the result of icdar2015 official evaluation script. All these values are lower than what is claimed in the paper.

Calculated!{"recall": 0.6721232546942706, "precision": 0.7977142857142857, "hmean": 0.7295531748105567, "AP": 0}
@mjq11302010044
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Godricly , your image scale may not be well set, you can set a larger input scale of a testing image, e.g. with (height / width) of (1000 / 1700) or larger, this can help with a performance gain, but this model is not our best model yet :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants