New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Look at schematics #30
Comments
The roles seem pretty shiny - I don't think I've seen that sort of idea with such a clean api before. |
Awesome, I think it would be great to reuse it in this lib, if it fits our needs: reinventing it would seem like a waste of human resources |
Based on their getting started, SchematicsAdapters could be usable like:
But that we could also do:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://github.com/schematics/schematics
http://schematics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
Looks like this gets a lot of things right that we're looking at. The API is nice, the
to_primitive
is a pretty good naming convention, and the validation/coercion/conversion logic seems clean. It lacks introspectability and good complex validation support as far as I can see, but it's pretty good!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: