Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about papper #42

Closed
WinstonDeng opened this issue Mar 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Question about papper #42

WinstonDeng opened this issue Mar 13, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@WinstonDeng
Copy link

When I read

During training, “VIBE” takes in-the-wild images as input and predicts SMPL body model parameters.

and

Then, a motion discriminator takes predicted poses along with the poses sampled from the AMASS dataset and outputs a real/fake label for each sequence.

one question that bothers me is that whether all poses from wild images are subset of AMASS dataset? If not , poses in the wild are complex and varied, so how discriminator to decide they are real by only using AMASS?

@athn-nik
Copy link
Collaborator

athn-nik commented Mar 31, 2020

AMASS is the largest MoCap dataset, right now. It is pretty much a unified dataset of all previous MoCap datasets. So it is big enough to assume that it contains a big variety of poses and motions.

We are not sure that covers the all of the motions that we encounter during training but it improves our results(see ablation table in the paper) and that demonstrates that it refines our pose estimations.

So the answer is we are not sure that all poses are subset of AMASS. Results show using it to discriminate between generated and true motions helps. Hence, it has a helpful enough variety of motions.

@WinstonDeng
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your relpy!I learn a lot from your work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants