Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have you compared your smpl annotations with the results by mosh? #13

Closed
gsygsy96 opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@gsygsy96
Copy link

gsygsy96 commented Sep 3, 2020

Hi @mks0601, thanks for your code and data! My question is whether you have compared your smpl fitting results with the one from mosh? For example, Kanazawa used to provide SMPL annotations of Human 3.6M which is computing using mosh. Which one is better?

@gsygsy96
Copy link
Author

gsygsy96 commented Sep 3, 2020

BTW, Smplify is a time-consuming optimization method. Could you share some details to efficiently fitting large benchmarks, such as COCO?

@gsygsy96 gsygsy96 changed the title Have you compare your smpl annotations with the results by mosh? Have you compared your smpl annotations with the results by mosh? Sep 3, 2020
@mks0601
Copy link
Owner

mks0601 commented Sep 3, 2020

SMPL Mosh fit is not accessible because of the license issue :( It's been maybe more than 1 year? so I couldn't calculate the error of Mosh fit. I reported error of my SMPLify-X fit to my paper (Table 13. 13.1mm). Also, for the time, I divide the dataset into several chunks and ran it on each GPU. Or you can estimate initial parameters using neural network and reduce the number of iteration following SPIN.

@gsygsy96
Copy link
Author

gsygsy96 commented Sep 4, 2020

Thanks for your help! I will try it!

@gsygsy96 gsygsy96 closed this as completed Sep 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants