Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Call Beast spell attack vs. Wild Shape #121

Closed
Marcloure opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Call Beast spell attack vs. Wild Shape #121

Marcloure opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Marcloure
Copy link
Collaborator

Call Beast states that:

When [the beast] attacks, make a melee spell attack in place of its attack, but retain the damage and other effects.

But for the Wild Shape spell, you keep the beast's attack bonus. Is this intended?

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner

mlenser commented May 2, 2020

Thematically I don't think either option should be based on a spell attack. I'll make sure that is not the case and that it is balanced after #87

@mlenser mlenser self-assigned this May 2, 2020
@Marcloure
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Marcloure commented May 2, 2020

Agreed

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner

mlenser commented May 2, 2020

As part of 20.0.0 when I release it:

Spells that use the companion system no longer use a spell attack in place of the creature’s normal melee attack

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner

mlenser commented May 2, 2020

This will go out at as part of 19.27.0

@mlenser mlenser closed this as completed May 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants