Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve "resistance from X from nonmagical attacks" #543

Closed
mlenser opened this issue Aug 30, 2020 · 20 comments
Closed

Resolve "resistance from X from nonmagical attacks" #543

mlenser opened this issue Aug 30, 2020 · 20 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner

mlenser commented Aug 30, 2020

As @itamarcu has pointed out several times this is just a magic item check.

Maybe the nonmagical part should be removed? Or maybe we should add soak for these cases?

@mlenser mlenser self-assigned this Aug 30, 2020
@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Aug 30, 2020

I'm in favor of using options like the following, whichever is the most flavorful (or fun), whenever it fits:

  • Resistance to just one or two of the physical damage types. Example: skeletons, trees
  • Resistance to damage unless it's from a silver weapon (replace silver with adamantine or cold iron or wood or whatever is flavorful)
  • Resistance to damage from the first source of damage every turn, or every round
  • Resistance to damage while below half health; or while above half health, that's also interesting
  • Resistance to damage while this creature is in its home plane
  • Immunity to partial hits (especially for elusive creatures)
  • Resistance to damage from ranged weapons

Some of the above could be resistance to all damage instead of just physical damage, and some could even be immunities. It all depends on flavor and balance and the tactics we'd like to include in the game.

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Aug 30, 2020

Resistance to just one or two of the physical damage types. Example: skeletons, trees
Resistance to damage unless it's from a silver weapon (replace silver with adamantine or cold iron or wood or whatever is flavorful)

These I like.

Resistance to damage from the first source of damage every turn, or every round
Resistance to damage while below half health; or while above half health, that's also interesting
Resistance to damage while this creature is in its home plane
Resistance to damage from ranged weapons

hmm, not sure these are cases for these

Immunity to partial hits (especially for elusive creatures)

Not likely to happen unless there is a super strong case for it.

@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Aug 30, 2020

Could you provide a list of monsters with resistance to nonmagical weapon damage? (assuming it's easy to search the data for it)

For spells, I found the following:

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Aug 30, 2020

It's a very long list. 201 creatures:
image
image
image
image
image

@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Sep 1, 2020

A lot of people have a lot of excuses for why certain monsters are resistant - there's many threads like this or this.

I believe the best solution might be to go through the list one by one and make decisions.

Air Elemental Myrmidon - It's an air elemental. How should weapons hurt air elementals? I think it should be resistance to bludgeoning and slashing, and immunity to piercing. Arrows have a hard time going through winds, and piercing in general probably can't "push" or "cut off" the elemental air. Alternatively, I think "resistance to damage from ranged attacks" could work here.

Alhoon - It's a mind flayer lich. I think weapon damage should affect it normally.

Alkilith - oh boy. It's an ooze demon. In 5e it has resistance to nonmagical B/P/S. Okay, but maybe in older editions it was more specific, and we can use it, right? Well, according to the "monstrous manual", it's got, um.... resistance to slashing and bludgeoning, but can only be hit by +2 weapons or better. not to mention it has "magic resistance 40%", whatever that is. So, uhh.... I guess we can make it simply resistant to slashing and bludgeoning weapons.

Allip - insane suicidal ghost. I think ghosts can be special and we can just make them immune to nonmagical bludgeoning/piercing/slashing damage and resistant/immune to some physical elements (fire, lightning, acid, necrotic?).

Amnizu - gruesome noble life-draining devil. I think we can go with silver for devils and cold iron for demons, like 3.5, though maybe some are special...? well, either way, "resistance to nonsilvered weapons" seems good enough here.

Androsphinx - they're just sphinxes. 3.5e and Pathfinder both give no special resistances to sphinxes. Not sure why 5e did. I think it can just be removed.

Annis Hag - 3.5e and PF gave them small damage resistance that is ignored with bludgeoning. I think the annis hag should get either resistance to slashing and piercing or no B/P/S resistance at all.

Arcanaloth - it's a jackal-head fiend (not devil or demon, just a "neutral fiend") and I can only find sources that give it blanket damage resistance, so.... let's go with BPS resistance regardless of magicalness. Extra soak (~5) would also work.

... this is a lot of work and I'm only 4% of the way through. 😬

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Sep 1, 2020

4%? Try 1%. There are 788 monsters.

Ya.. lots of work.

@DalenWBrauner
Copy link
Contributor

We're hoping to remove all cases of resistance to any nonmagical damage, right? Not just cases of resistance to damage from nonmagical weapons? I feel like both are equally harmful.

If a creature has resistance to nonmagical bludgeoning damage, for instance, they would take reduced damage from falling. I've also heard weird debate over whether a creature should resist "ordinary" rocks falling on their head vs "magical" rocks falling on their head, e.g. Upheaval.

For these reasons, as well as the original cons, I don't care for distinguishing between "magic" and "nonmagic" damage at all.


Judging from the amount of work that would be required, the wide menagerie of monsters that have it, the even wider range of reasons why they would have it, and the lack of consensus for each... yeah, I say just give them Soak. It might seem lazy, but at least it's practical. (And frankly, I feel like 'resistance to nonmagical weaponry' isn't quite the paragon of effort and creativity either.) Plus, soak values can always be adjusted on a per-monster basis later.

@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Sep 1, 2020

I'm okay with Soak as a default but I think we can at least cover some broad strokes first, implement a good fix to the low-hanging fruit, where we can select a group of 10+ monsters and change them all together.

  • Devils should have resistance to nonsilvered BPS
  • Demons and Fey should have resistance to non-cold-iron BPS
  • Golems and constructs should have resistance to non-adamantium BPS.
  • Elementals should be similar regarding these damage types, we should figure out exactly how. For example, I think Earth elementals could be immune to P and S, and Water elementals could be immune to B, and Fire elementals could be resistant to BPS.
  • Ghosts/specters should be similar, and I think they are the one case where magical weapons make sense (as most things go right through them). It should still be about magical weapons, though, and not magical rocks or knives or thorns. It could also be a new property of weapon we decide to add, such as "runic" or something.
  • Bone creatures (like skeletons) could be resistant to PS, possible even vulnerable to B (like skeletons?)
  • Undead like zombies and mummies... I think they could have no resistance, or they could just have more soak, except for special cases.
  • A bunch of extraplanar creatures can easily have "resistance to BPS while in its home plane"

@DalenWBrauner
Copy link
Contributor

I like that approach, and each of those suggestions.

Nitpicking Ghosts/Spectres: These are generally capable of avoiding damage because they're partially ethereal, right?

I generally like the concept that some "magical" attacks might be able to strike them effectively while nonmagical attacks can't, but also feel like it still shouldn't fall to just a "Do you have a magic weapon?" check. And if magic can hit them... does it seem strange to anyone else that Upheaval or Burning Hands can be fully effective against something only partially on this plane? What about the fire from a mundane torch? I just feel like we need a smarter criteria than "sufficiently magical".

@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Sep 1, 2020

Actually for ethereal creatures I was thinking of giving them something like

Damage resistances - acid, concussion, fire, lightning; bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from spells and nonmagical weapons
Damage immunities - cold, necrotic, poison

This way, magical weapons are actually more effective than spells (barring psychic, radiant, and force; the "less physical" damage sources).

Another option is to do what other editions did and say "every time an incorporeal creature takes damage, there's a 50% chance it doesn't take that damage".

@Marcloure
Copy link
Collaborator

Marcloure commented Sep 13, 2020

What happens to creatures (e.g.: spirit troll) that has immunity to b/p/s damage from nonmagical attacks? I don't believe they can become immune to all b/p/s damage.

@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Sep 14, 2020

For the Spirit Troll, its flavor is that it's a combination of a ghost and a troll, both very resistant to things. The Spirit Troll has a regeneration trait that functions unless it is dealt psychic or force damage, and it has resistance/immunity to basically everything except psychic, force, poison, and necrotic. It's basically a monster renowned for being hard to kill.

I think it's flavorful enough to keep it as it is, remaining one of the rare monsters that can only be damaged with magic weapons and with specific spells. I think the treatment should be similar to what we do with ghosts.

Damage resistances - acid, cold, concussion, fire, lightning
Damage immunities - bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from spells and nonmagical weapons

@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Oct 17, 2020

Similarly, I would suggest that the spell Stoneskin be changed to just grant resistance from B/P/S regardless of magicalness of the source (and remove the augment). That is, unless there is some really good flavor reason for Stoneskin to be particularly vulnerable to magic weapons.

@shemetz
Copy link
Collaborator

shemetz commented Nov 30, 2020

We've created this online spreadsheet to list monsters with resistance to nonmagical weapon damage.

This isn't final yet, but the basic idea was to add some additional weapon materials/properties (Silver, Cold Iron, Obsidian, Adamantine, Runic, Hallowed, Desecrated) and to use some broad replacements depending on creature categories. See the other tabs in that document for explanations.

@mlenser mlenser closed this as completed Dec 1, 2020
@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Dec 1, 2020

  • All demons are now resistant or immune to bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from weapons that aren’t made of cold iron instead of nonmagical weapons. If it previously did not have any resistance the health dice have been slightly reduced
  • Marut, Sacred Statue, and Steel Predator damage resistances are now bypassed by adamantine. Scarecrow loses its damage resistance in favor of a bit more health and defense

@mlenser mlenser reopened this Dec 1, 2020
@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Dec 1, 2020

All fey are now resistant to bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from weapons that aren’t made of cold iron instead of nonmagical weapons. If it previously did not have any resistance the health dice have been slightly reduced

@mlenser mlenser closed this as completed Dec 1, 2020
@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Dec 1, 2020

Not sure what to do with the rest

@mlenser mlenser reopened this Dec 1, 2020
@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Dec 2, 2020

Earth Elementals, Galeb Duhr, and Zaratan damage resistances are now bypassed by adamantine

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Dec 2, 2020

Ice Elemental damage resistances are now bypassed by adamantine

@mlenser
Copy link
Owner Author

mlenser commented Dec 3, 2020

All creatures have been updated based on the spreadsheet. See the latest changelog

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants