[BUG] 413 Client Error: Request Entity Too Large for url #10332
Labels
area/artifacts
Artifact stores and artifact logging
area/tracking
Tracking service, tracking client APIs, autologging
bug
Something isn't working
Issues Policy acknowledgement
Where did you encounter this bug?
Other
Willingness to contribute
Yes. I can contribute a fix for this bug independently.
MLflow version
System information
Describe the problem
When I try to log a model above a certain size (25MB worked, probably above 50?) then I face an error.
I use Google Cloud Run, PostgreSQL and Google Cloud Storage
MLFLOW_GCS_UPLOAD_CHUNK_SIZE set for 262144
Tracking information
Code to reproduce issue
Stack trace
Other info / logs
What component(s) does this bug affect?
area/artifacts
: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build
: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs
: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples
: Example codearea/gateway
: AI Gateway service, Gateway client APIs, third-party Gateway integrationsarea/model-registry
: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models
: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/recipes
: Recipes, Recipe APIs, Recipe configs, Recipe Templatesarea/projects
: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring
: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra
: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking
: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingWhat interface(s) does this bug affect?
area/uiux
: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker
: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy
: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows
: Windows supportWhat language(s) does this bug affect?
language/r
: R APIs and clientslanguage/java
: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new
: Proposals for new client languagesWhat integration(s) does this bug affect?
integrations/azure
: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker
: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks
: Databricks integrationsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: