Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
I'm on the liberal side of tags. I work a lot with DICOM; tags, and HL7; segments. Both support customer tags/segments which is very useful. One issue here is tags/segment collision, more on the HL7 side. For example ZDS is a common custom segment in HL7. As it's custom what's inside is not standardized and that's where the collision come in. All that aside though it's not an issue for you as you are the parser. I'll add an example latter on how to post process that data and filter out non-standard tags. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am at the moment trying to implement all rules in the specification. By doing that, I found some flaws in the grammar implemented, and fixed some of them. With tags, it is a little bit different, and therefore I wanted to start a discussion about it.
Possible Requirements
What will the people want to do with the pgn-parser? That may depend ...
What are the options here?
variant
,white|blackRatingDiff
,white|blackFideId
).What is your opinion about it? I would like to implement something that is
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions