Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add a link for building mlpack from source to index page of trac wiki #267

Closed
rcurtin opened this issue Dec 29, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@rcurtin
Copy link
Member

rcurtin commented Dec 29, 2014

Reported by hustcalm on 23 Dec 43338221 00:52 UTC
As the index page of wiki(http://www.mlpack.org/trac/wiki), two minor changes may need to be made:

  1. library dependencies

mlpack depends on the following libraries:

 LAPACK
 BLAS
 Armadillo >= 2.4.2
 LibXml2 >= 2.6.0
 Boost - program_options, math_c99, unit_test_framework, random 

if Armadillo, LibXml2 and Boost are enough to get mlpack run, do we consider to remove LAPACK and BLAS ?

  1. add a link for building instructions

All of these should be available in your distribution's package manager.

Suggest to make it as:
All of these should be available in your distribution's package manager, for more information about installing these packages, please refer to http://www.mlpack.org/doxygen.php?doc=build.html.

@rcurtin rcurtin self-assigned this Dec 29, 2014
@rcurtin rcurtin added this to the mlpack 1.0.7 milestone Dec 29, 2014
@rcurtin rcurtin closed this as completed Dec 29, 2014
@rcurtin
Copy link
Member Author

rcurtin commented Dec 30, 2014

Commented by rcurtin on 10 Aug 43340121 16:34 UTC
No, LAPACK and BLAS are (in general) necessary so that Armadillo will work. Usually this is handled by the package manager, but not always.

I won't link to the stable release's build instructions because they may be different. Instead when a user checks the package out with svn, they can look at the README.txt file for build instructions.

There is not a point filing bugs about things which "theoretically could be confusing to users" unless you actually have valid proof that they are confusing valid users (or in this case, developers).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant