You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
if Armadillo, LibXml2 and Boost are enough to get mlpack run, do we consider to remove LAPACK and BLAS ?
add a link for building instructions
All of these should be available in your distribution's package manager.
Suggest to make it as:
All of these should be available in your distribution's package manager, for more information about installing these packages, please refer to http://www.mlpack.org/doxygen.php?doc=build.html.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Commented by rcurtin on 10 Aug 43340121 16:34 UTC
No, LAPACK and BLAS are (in general) necessary so that Armadillo will work. Usually this is handled by the package manager, but not always.
I won't link to the stable release's build instructions because they may be different. Instead when a user checks the package out with svn, they can look at the README.txt file for build instructions.
There is not a point filing bugs about things which "theoretically could be confusing to users" unless you actually have valid proof that they are confusing valid users (or in this case, developers).
Reported by hustcalm on 23 Dec 43338221 00:52 UTC
As the index page of wiki(http://www.mlpack.org/trac/wiki), two minor changes may need to be made:
mlpack depends on the following libraries:
if Armadillo, LibXml2 and Boost are enough to get mlpack run, do we consider to remove LAPACK and BLAS ?
All of these should be available in your distribution's package manager.
Suggest to make it as:
All of these should be available in your distribution's package manager, for more information about installing these packages, please refer to http://www.mlpack.org/doxygen.php?doc=build.html.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: