You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Often the work I need to do on the contents of MultiValue does not require them to be in the order passed to the function. In these cases it would be more efficient to access the Vec directly without reversing its contents.
I suggest that a method be added to MultiValue called into_rev_vec(), which would return the Vec as-is. A matching from_rev_vec method should also be added to create a MultiValue from a Vec without reversing its contents.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Often the work I need to do on the contents of
MultiValue
does not require them to be in the order passed to the function. In these cases it would be more efficient to access theVec
directly without reversing its contents.I suggest that a method be added to
MultiValue
calledinto_rev_vec()
, which would return theVec
as-is. A matchingfrom_rev_vec
method should also be added to create aMultiValue
from aVec
without reversing its contents.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: