-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
different runs for different subjects #353
different runs for different subjects #353
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it already functional on your end @crsegerie ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left some small suggestions
Is this already working as intended for you locally? :)
change return type Co-authored-by: Richard Höchenberger <richard.hoechenberger@gmail.com>
change docstring if None return Co-authored-by: Richard Höchenberger <richard.hoechenberger@gmail.com>
docstring update Co-authored-by: Richard Höchenberger <richard.hoechenberger@gmail.com>
Not quite. There is still an error on my own :
The killed surprises me, because I do not see it in CI And at the beginning of each step, the warning appears:
I should change it to only warn for the first step |
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Gramfort <alexandre.gramfort@m4x.org>
This most likely indicates that you're running out of memory … We'd need to see how to optimize things here. This problem seems unrelated to this PR though |
@agramfort Do you think instead of concatenating all filtered runs before creating epochs, we could create epochs for each run individually and then concat those? This would avoid the out-of-memory problem @crsegerie sees locally. 8+ runs is heavy stuff. |
Ah, right, there is I can take a stab at this sometime later today (separate PR) |
…erie/mne-bids-pipeline into different-runs-by-subjects
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Gramfort <alexandre.gramfort@m4x.org>
I added this |
delete parentheses Co-authored-by: Richard Höchenberger <richard.hoechenberger@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just some nitpicks re docstrings, otherwise LGTM
config.py
Outdated
|
||
|
||
def get_intersect_run() -> list: | ||
'''Returns the intersection of all the runs of all subjects.''' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you use double-quotes """xxxx"""
around the docstring please?
Great job, @crsegerie!!! |
+1 really cool !
… |
🎉 |
Closes #352.
During the process, I've moved up the get_subjects() function without changing it.
Before merging …
docs/source/changes.md
)