Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aggregating results on the gradient #19

Closed
dmcglinn opened this issue Mar 24, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

aggregating results on the gradient #19

dmcglinn opened this issue Mar 24, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@dmcglinn
Copy link
Member

Hey @rueuntal we discussed how dat_plot would be the input for a gradient method and would be identical to the pairwise case except it will now have additional columns for the continuous variables. Along these continuous variables we have several options for aggregating the rarefaction information.

  1. use the group variable to identify unique "sites" along the gradient compute rarefaction for each site and then place it on the gradient according to that site's mean value along the gradient
  2. compute all the unique values of the gradient variable and then compute rarefaction results at each of these unique places along the gradient.
  3. bin the values of the gradient and then apply the method suggested in 2.
@dmcglinn
Copy link
Member Author

I think I'm leaning towards using the user defined groups as these can be more easily talyored to reflect the experimental design and thus the actual number of replicates.

@rueuntal
Copy link
Contributor

Hey Dan - Sorry to get back to you this late, I forgot to put a note on this email and it got lost in my inbox. Yes, I totally agree.

@rueuntal
Copy link
Contributor

I think this has already been resolved with the group_var vs env_var arguments in get_delta_stats by now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants