You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey @rueuntal we discussed how dat_plot would be the input for a gradient method and would be identical to the pairwise case except it will now have additional columns for the continuous variables. Along these continuous variables we have several options for aggregating the rarefaction information.
use the group variable to identify unique "sites" along the gradient compute rarefaction for each site and then place it on the gradient according to that site's mean value along the gradient
compute all the unique values of the gradient variable and then compute rarefaction results at each of these unique places along the gradient.
bin the values of the gradient and then apply the method suggested in 2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think I'm leaning towards using the user defined groups as these can be more easily talyored to reflect the experimental design and thus the actual number of replicates.
Hey @rueuntal we discussed how
dat_plot
would be the input for a gradient method and would be identical to the pairwise case except it will now have additional columns for the continuous variables. Along these continuous variables we have several options for aggregating the rarefaction information.group
variable to identify unique "sites" along the gradient compute rarefaction for each site and then place it on the gradient according to that site's mean value along the gradientThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: