New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to count operator record variables in balanced model checking #866
Comments
Comment by hansolsson on 21 Oct 2015 15:15 UTC
The following list in 4.7 should be clarified to also include operator record: For each declared component of specialized class type (Real, Integer, String, Boolean, enumeration and arrays of those, etc) or record, not declared as outer, it is the “number of unknown variables” inside it (i.e., excluding parameters and constants and counting the elements after expanding all records and arrays to a set of scalars of primitive types). The other option of requiring matching operator record variables with operator record equations would be different from treating all other variables, and also not handle equations such as |
Comment by hansolsson on 30 Mar 2016 13:00 UTC
The proposal is thus: And can be discussed at the next meeting. |
Comment by hansolsson on 20 Jun 2016 14:34 UTC |
Comment by hansolsson on 23 Jun 2016 11:40 UTC |
Comment by hansolsson on 23 Sep 2016 11:35 UTC |
Modified by hansolsson on 23 Sep 2016 11:35 UTC |
Reported by peter.fritzson on 10 Oct 2012 06:14 UTC
Section 4.7. Balanced Models
Definition 1: Local Number of Unknowns
Are variables of operator record types expanded into primitive elements or not when counting?
This is not specified and should be in the specification.
Migrated-From: https://trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/866
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: