New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bug in Modelica.Fluid.Pipes.DynamicPipe #215
Comments
Comment by kilian_link on 1 Oct 2009 09:32 UTC Modelica.Fluid.Pipes.BaseClasses.FlowModels.NominalTurbulentPipeFlow seems to be still buggy and should be fixed by someone who is familar with the model layout in Fluid. |
Comment by rfranke on 2 Oct 2009 13:59 UTC It turns out that there were two bugs in the NominalLaminarFlow model:
The NominalTurbulentPipeFlow model was facing the first bug only. It now considers the number of flow segments as well. The NominalTurbulentPipeFlow model is more complex because it uses the regular TurbulentPipeFlow and adapts the pipe length such that the specified nominal pressure drop is fulfilled. This ticket also covers another bug: the consideration of the number of parallel pipes for the velocity of fluid flow. The flow velocity should not be adapted in the flow model, but in the overall pipe models. Also there one wants to see the correct velocity. This is why I reverted your changes in PartialStaggeredFlowModel. The pipe models PartialTwoPortFlow (base class of DynamicPipe) and StaticPipe have been corrected instead. See SVN, 9663715. |
Comment by dietmarw on 2 Oct 2009 15:50 UTC |
Comment by dietmarw on 25 Nov 2009 11:53 UTC |
Reported by kilian_link on 23 Sep 2009 15:23 UTC
discretization of linear pressure drop correlation fails, i.e. linear pressure drop depends on nNodes and is wrong for nNodes>1
Migrated-From: https://trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/215
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: