You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
SFT not properly accounting for multi-species. For example, compare the list files (*.m3d) from the two attached models, 1 and 2 species, respectively.
sends in numactive equal to the number of SFT cells. However, CNEWSF gets picked-up as x and numactive gets picked up as n. In xmdsolv.f, on line 1961, x is dimensioned as x(n), but this is a problem because CNEWSF is dimensioned as CNEWSF(1:650,1:2) when it gets sent in, and so the second species is not properly accounted for.
Tested with multi-species version of the 'CrnkNic' test problem. Please confirm all looks OK with your real-world model and reopen the issue if something is still amiss.
Screen shot showing budget for second species in SFT:
SFT not properly accounting for multi-species. For example, compare the list files (*.m3d) from the two attached models, 1 and 2 species, respectively.
The following call in gnt1.f (line 39):
sends in numactive equal to the number of SFT cells. However,
CNEWSF
gets picked-up asx
andnumactive
gets picked up asn
. In xmdsolv.f, on line 1961, x is dimensioned asx(n)
, but this is a problem because CNEWSF is dimensioned asCNEWSF(1:650,1:2)
when it gets sent in, and so the second species is not properly accounted for.CrnkNic.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: