Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UZT documentation #35

Closed
vivekbedekar opened this issue May 8, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

UZT documentation #35

vivekbedekar opened this issue May 8, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vivekbedekar
Copy link
Collaborator

From: Feinstein, Daniel [mailto:dtfeinst@usgs.gov]
Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2018 2:34 PM
To: Vivek Bedekar vivekb@sspa.com
Subject: ahh- the problem I think is with MT3D-USGS documentation

Hi Vivek,

Referring to my last email:

The I/O manual for UZT it seems to say that you need to make INCUZET=-1 and INCGWET=-1 even if no ET is active in UZF package. But that is not right. The "-1" values act to make UZT reuse the infiltration concentration from the last stress period - which is disastrous for my run.

When I take out the previous INCUZET and INCGWET lines:
-1
-1
then the results make sense.

Is this the correct interpretation of the manual? Maybe you have already addressed this problem in a
release?

I am sending you a new UZT package - please check the end to make sure it now
makes sense.

thanks much,
d

@vivekbedekar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Eric,

I have added a line in the input instructions to clarify this. However, there seems to be an issue in the code. IETFLG flag is initially based on IET. But IETFLG is later potentially changed based on IUZFOPTG. Please check the code.

Vivek

@emorway-usgs emorway-usgs self-assigned this May 18, 2019
@emorway-usgs
Copy link
Collaborator

There is a comment in the code near where this happens:

C--If the check on IUZFBND called IUZFBND_CHK remains false,     
C--then the value of IUZFOPT can be set equal to zero, since all 
C--cells are effectively acting as though IUZFOPT=0

So, even though the user may specify that the IET starts out as one, if values read in the linker file state otherwise, the flag is reset.

The clarification in the documentation looks good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants