Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Offer a bundled MollySocket service #320

Open
1 task done
ghost opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

Offer a bundled MollySocket service #320

ghost opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
feature-request New feature or request

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 14, 2024

Is there an existing request for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Feature description

It would be nice if Molly could offer UP functionality out of the box through a bundled MollySocket server. Such a public server could be airgapped for better security.

Offering such a service at volume would bring economies of scale and the community at large should be able to cover the costs of server deployment.

Given the various known issues with FCM notifications and the problem of each app installed on a device needing its own WebSocket connection, UP becomes the only scalable and practical solution going forward for all open source apps. By allowing users to start using UP with Molly today, this community would be charting the path forward for the entire open source world on Android.

This would also resolve #126

@ghost ghost added the feature-request New feature or request label May 14, 2024
@jayb-g
Copy link

jayb-g commented May 20, 2024

Even better, if Signal is willing to support UP - same as it supports FCM/websockets, it would be FCM/UP/websockets, then the battery drain issue goes away(mostly) and molly gets UP support automatically.

Maybe we should create FR on Signal for same.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant