You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To avoid divisions by zero, thicknesses default to ANGSTROM. ANGTROM=0 should work and doing so will allow us to test and validate solutions with and without mask_tables.
Might need to add land masks to the APE calculation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Commit 0f7c079 solves the issue of masked PEs changing the APE calculation.
Leaving ticket open since we still need to check that initializing massless layers to ANGSTROM with ANGSTROM=0 works (should do but hasn't been verified).
We have been able to use ANGSTROM=0 for all of the test cases in MOM6-examples for over a year now, although this does require that the various ..._2018_ANSWERS run-time flags be set to .false. (which has been the default since PR #1127 was merged into dev/gfdl in June, 2020). Both the change to ANGSTROM = 0 and changing the value of the various ..._2018_ANSWERS flags will change answers, although the solutions are all qualitatively similar.
To avoid divisions by zero, thicknesses default to ANGSTROM. ANGTROM=0 should work and doing so will allow us to test and validate solutions with and without mask_tables.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: