You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider a situation wherein there exists a typo in one of the test scenario files - say an expected field is missing. As written currently, the test runner will notice the error when it attempts to access the missing field, probably in astrolabe.spec_runner.AtlasTestCase.run. Attempting to access this non-existent field would raise an AttributeError which would be propagated back to the user and terminate the entire test run.
astrolabe should be robustified to deal with this kind of erroneous test file content. A faulty spec test should only cause that particular test to fail, but should not impede the remainder of the test run from proceeding as usual.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
UPDATE: since we now run one-test-per-task a faulty test scenario file will no longer impede other tests (for which the files don't have any errors). Consequently, this is no longer a major concern and can be closed.
Consider a situation wherein there exists a typo in one of the test scenario files - say an expected field is missing. As written currently, the test runner will notice the error when it attempts to access the missing field, probably in
astrolabe.spec_runner.AtlasTestCase.run
. Attempting to access this non-existent field would raise anAttributeError
which would be propagated back to the user and terminate the entire test run.astrolabe
should be robustified to deal with this kind of erroneous test file content. A faulty spec test should only cause that particular test to fail, but should not impede the remainder of the test run from proceeding as usual.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: