You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please use the 馃憤 reaction to show that you are interested into the same feature.
Please don't comment if you have no relevant information to add. It's just extra noise for everyone subscribed to this issue.
Subscribe to receive notifications on status change and new comments.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to allow a given user (or all users) to have unlimited storage. In Monica 4.x I believe this was achieved by setting the limit to "0" which was interpreted as infinite, but when I do that in 5.x I get:
Describe the solution you'd like
So long as we're inventing a new amount, I'd suggest that setting the storage limit to -1 should result in no limit. That way if someone truly doesn't want to allow any form of upload they could use 0 for that purpose.
Describe alternatives you've considered (optional)
An alternative that is possible now would be to set an incredibly high number for the limit. It'd be nice to have something more explicit, though.
Additional context
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
How to use GitHub
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to allow a given user (or all users) to have unlimited storage. In Monica 4.x I believe this was achieved by setting the limit to "0" which was interpreted as infinite, but when I do that in 5.x I get:
Describe the solution you'd like
So long as we're inventing a new amount, I'd suggest that setting the storage limit to -1 should result in no limit. That way if someone truly doesn't want to allow any form of upload they could use 0 for that purpose.
Describe alternatives you've considered (optional)
An alternative that is possible now would be to set an incredibly high number for the limit. It'd be nice to have something more explicit, though.
Additional context
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: